cabbage/labor

E-Verify

Requiring agricultural employers to use e-Verify without assuring that a workable guest worker program is in place could have a significant, negative impact on U.S. farm production.

E-Verify

E-Verify is a federal, online system to determine authorization to work in the U.S. Unfortunately, while E-Verify may not adversely affect some parts of the U.S. economy, it could have dire impacts on agriculture due to the lack of U.S. workers and the absence of a workable visa program. Requiring agricultural employers to use e-Verify without assuring that a workable guest worker program is in place could have a significant, negative impact on U.S. farm production, not only threatening the livelihoods of many farmers and ranchers in labor-intensive agriculture but jeopardizing as well the health of the rural economy, where agriculture plays an important role.

Impact on Ag and Consumers

A Farm Bureau-commissioned study shows enforcement-only immigration reform, including mandatory E-Verify, would cause production to drop by $60 billion and food prices to rise 5 to 6 percent. The reason is simple: with fewer and fewer Americans opting to work on farms, American agriculture increasingly depends on workers from other countries to harvest our crops. Without those workers – who are particularly important in the fruit and vegetable sector and in dairy – American farms would be in jeopardy. Moreover, the US Department of Agriculture is encouraging greater consumption of fruits and vegetables. Americans’ diets, particularly those of low-income households, fall well short of government recommendations in the quantity of fruits and vegetables consumed. USDA ERS research shows that today, fruits and vegetables account for 16 to 18 percent of food spending for at-home consumption in an average low-income household. (This number should be 40 to 50 percent to meet government consumption recommendations for fruits and vegetables.) Increasing food prices due to mandatory E-Verify would only make that goal less obtainable.

Enforcement-only immigration reform would cripple agriculture production in America.

AFBF Policy

Farm Bureau believes any federal mandates on employers to implement E-Verify must:

  • Be based on an employment eligibility verification system that is simple, conclusive, and timely;
  • Provide an affirmative defense for employers acting in good faith;
  • Allow status adjustment for workers not authorized prior to implementation; and
  • Be preceded by full implementation of a usable agricultural worker program.

Farm Bureau opposes any mandate on employers to use E-Verify until an acceptable agriculture worker program is in place that provides for future flow of guest workers and allows work authorization for workers not currently authorized.

Background

The Immigration and Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) made it unlawful for employers to hire or employ individuals not authorized to work in the United States. Since that time, employers have been required to use the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Form I-9, which is completed by job applicants who submit the form to employers with specified documents that testify to their identity and work authorization. IRCA, however, prohibits employers from questioning the documents offered by applicants, and any employer who questions the documents offered by job applicants or refuses to hire based on reasonable-appearing documents can be sued, not only by the job applicant, but also by the Department of Justice. The Department of Agriculture website explicitly advises farmers that “Employers must accept any of the documents or combination of documents listed on the back of the INS Form I-9 to establish identity and employment eligibility.”

As a result of these policies instituted 25 years ago, use of fraudulent documents by workers has become prevalent, in agriculture and elsewhere. There have been bills introduced in the past that would mandate that employers use E-Verify and phase in the requirement over several years. For many agricultural producers, the requirement would begin in three years; for others, the requirement could start sooner. Most importantly, the legislation contains no worker program for agriculture – either in remedying problems with the H-2A program or in instituting any additional program to assist agricultural employers. If the mandatory E-Verify program goes forward by itself, without providing producers a source of legal workers, it would present a potentially insurmountable challenge for many agricultural employers. Farm Bureau economists estimate that agricultural production would fall $30-60 billion and food prices would rise 5-6 percent if Congress passes enforcement only reform (including border security, interior enforcement and e-verify).

Farm Bureau believes any federal mandates on employers to implement e-Verify must:

  • Be based on an employment eligibility verification system that is simple, conclusive, and timely;
  • Provide an affirmative defense for employers acting in good faith;
  • Allow status adjustment for workers not authorized prior to implementation; and
  • Be preceded by full implementation of a usable agricultural worker program.

Border Security

Farm Bureau believes we must secure the border of the United States by the most technologically advanced means possible and with minimal impact on farmers and ranchers. This includes increased presence and cooperation of all branches of law enforcement and increased penalties for illegal entry and drug and human trafficking into the U.S.

Farm Bureau also believes the most critical component of border security is to fix the immigration system – including creating legal ways for agricultural workers to enter the country to fill jobs. Our government should focus on preventing those with real criminal intent from entering our country, rather than wasting time and resources locking up farm workers. As long as there is demand in the U.S. for farm workers, hard-working people will continue to enter the U.S. to earn a living for themselves and their families back home. Creating a legal way for them to do so, and a way to know who they are and what they’re doing while they are here, makes us more secure.